Various methods based on growing bodies are lately gaining attention in a context of inverse gravity problem that we call a family of “assembly methods”. A variant of method was adopted for GIS INTEGRO in original formulation that is fit for the problem of multiple bodies incorporated in an environment of varying density, in absolute densities (not density contrasts) that are however have to be a priori specified. Such formulation allowed the implementation of the method that is suitable for territory modeling in the regional scale. To workaround method’s instability a number of changes are proposed that consist of introduction of priority on atomic modifications, modification queue and assessment of model evolution instead of just the final result. The developed software allows processing of large grids (tens of millions of tiling elements) even on 5–8 year old desktops. Based on method approbation experience some insights and practice methods are presented. An application example is presented as part of work on modeling of Enisei-Khatanga regional depression territory.

Sergey V. Mitsyn
Researcher of Geoinformatics Division of All-Russian
Research Geological Oil Institute
8 Varshavskoye sh., Moscow, 117105, Russia
e-mail: smitsyn@yandex.ru

Egor M. Bolshakov
Researcher of Geoinformatics Division of All-Russian
Research Geological Oil Institute
8 Varshavskoye sh., Moscow, 117105, Russia
e-mail: bolshakov.e.m@yandex.ru

1. Balk P.I., Yeske A. V.N. Strakhov”s mounting approach to solving inverse problems of gravity prospecting: the current state and real possibilities. Geophysical Journal. 2013;35(1):12–26.
2. Bakhvalov N.S., Zhidkov N.P., Kobel’kov G.M. Chislennye metody [Numeric methods]. Moscow: BINOM. Laboratoriya znanii; 2015. 639 p.
3. Dolgal A.S., Balk P.I., Demenev A.G., Michurin A.V., Novikova P.N., Rashidov V.A., Christenko L.A., Sharkhimullin A.F. The finite-element method application for interpretation of gravity and magnetic data. Bulletin of Kamchatka Regional Association “Educational-Scientific Center”. Earth sciences. 2012;19(1):108–127.
4. Dolgal A.S. Decomposition of the gravitational field inversion using the assembly method for the ore model. Bulletin of Kamchatka Regional Association “Educational-Scientific Center”. Earth sciences. 2019;41(1):25–36. DOI: 10.31431/1816-5524-2019-1-41-25-36.
5. Kobrunov A.I. Matematicheskie osnovy teorii interpretatsii geofizicheskikh dannykh [Mathematical foundations of theory of geophysical data interpretation]. Moscow: CnetrLitNefteGaz; 2008. 286 p.
6. Mudretsova E.A., Veselov K.E. Gravirazvedka: spravochnik geofizika [Gravity survey: geophysicist’s reference]. Moscow: Nedra; 1990. 607 p.
7. Petrischevskii A.M. Tri obraza myshleniya i tri podkhoda k interpretatsii gravitatsionnykh anomalii [Three ways of thinking and three approaches to interpretation of gravity anomalies]. Regional’nye problemy. 2014;14(2):5–17.
8. Black P.E. Greedy algorithm. In: Dictionary of Algorithms and Data Structures. Ed. 2. 2005. Available at: https://www.nist.gov/dads/HTML/greedyalgo.html (accessed 26.07.2021).
9. Camacho A.G., Montesinos F.G., Vieira R. Gravity inversion by means of growing bodies. Geophysics. 2000;65(1): 95–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444729.
10. Nagy D., Papp G., Benedek J. The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism. Journal of Geodesy. 2000;74(7–8): 552–560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900000116.
11. Uieda L., Barbosa V.C.F. 3D gravity inversion by planting anomalous densities. In: 12th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society & EXPOGEF. (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 15–18 August 2011). Rio de Janeiro: Brazilian Geophysical Society; 2011. pp. 867–871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/sbgf2011-179