Study of the structure of land in the 18th–21st centuries using GIS technology methods in Kenozersky national park

№2 (2024)

Kozykin A.V., Nakvasina E.N.

УДК 332.3 : 004.932.72
https://doi.org/10.47148/1609-364X-2024-2-4-11

AbstractAbout the AuthorsReferences
GIS technologies open up wide opportunities in historical and environmental research, including for assessing the historical transformation of land. These transformations are related to socio-economic situations and are reflected in landscapes. We have studied the dynamics of land use (natural and farmland) of different categories in a key area of the Kenozersky National Park (Arkhangelsk Region) with a total area of 56.5 thousand hectares. For this purpose, the plans of the General Surveying of the 1780s, the special surveying of 1861, the satellite images of 1986 and 2021, as well as the forest management plans of 2014 were used. The binding of raster analogues of boundary plans and their vectorization were carried out using the basic tools of the ArcGIS program. The dynamics of land use within the key area under study for 250 years is shown, broken down into categories of land use corresponding to the attributes of their time, including the dynamics of agricultural land, reflecting the socio-economic structure. Historically, the transformation of landscapes reflects the relative stability of maximum plowing of land when using a slash-and-burn (shifting) farming system of agriculture in combination with a three-field system in the 18th-19th centuries. Subsequent twofold changes in the socio-economic system in the 20th–21st centuries led to the complete loss of all arable land within the key area and its transfer to the category of natural plantings when overgrown with forest.
Alexander V. Kozykin
Researcher
National Park “Kenozersky”
78, Nab. S. Dvina, Arkhangelsk, 163000, Russia
e-mail: gryllus2007@gmail.com
ORCID: 0009-0002-7182-953X
Researcher ID: HNQ-5782-2023

Elena N. Nakvasina
Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor
Professor of the Department of Forestry and Forest Management
The Higher School of Natural Sciences and Technologies of the Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov
17, Nab. S. Dvina, Arkhangelsk, 163000, Russia
е-mail: e.nakvasina@narfu.ru
ORCID: 0000-0002-7360-3975
ResercherID: A-5165-2013
ScopusID: 35389250000
SPIN-код: 6797-9434
AuthorID: 132027

  1. Otero I., Marull J., Tello E., Diana G. L., Pons M., Coll F., Boada M. Land abandonment, landscape, and biodiversity: questioning the restorative character of the forest transition in the Mediterranean. Ecology and Society. 2015;20(2):7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07378-200207.
  2. Trapeznikova O.N. Historical analysis of the dynamics of agriculture in the forest zone of the East European plain. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya geograficheskaya. 2017;(2):87-99. DOI: 10.15356/0373-2444-2017-2-87-99.
  3. Yin Н., Prishchepov A.V, Kuemmerle T., Bleyhl B., Buchner J., Radeloff V.C. Mapping agricultural land abandonment from spatial and temporal segmentation of Landsat time series. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2018;210:12–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.02.050.
  4. Konchakov R.B., Baranova E.V. GIS in historical research: the current trend. In: XV Derzhavin reading. All-Russian Scientific Conference (February 2010). Kanishchev V.V., ed. Tambov: TGU imeni G. R. Derzhavina; 2010. Vol. 1. pp. 154–162.
  5. Bryukhanova E.A., Rygalova M.V. Historical GIS on-line: a review of foreign and Russian projects. Izvestiya of Altai State University. 2016;(2):56–59. DOI 10.14258/izvasu(2016)2-08.
  6. Baranova E.V., Kanishchev V.V., Konchakov R.B. Problem of the relationship of historical sources and GIS technologies (based on noble tenure Tambov and Tula provinces late XVIII – early XX centuries). Historical Information Science. 2013;(2):42–49.
  7. Batalov R.N., Radchenko L.K. Overview of main directions of using GIS technologies in historical and cartografhical research. Vestnik SSUGT. 2020;25(1):119-135. DOI: 10.33764/2411-1759-2020-25-1-119-135.
  8. Trapeznikova O.N. Geoecological conception of agrolandscape. Regional Research of Russia. 2014;146(1):73–85.
  9. Golubeva L.V., Nakvasina E.N. Transformatsiya postagrogennykh zemel’ na karbonatnykh otlozheniyakh [Transformation of postagrogenic lands on carbonate deposits]. Arkhangelsk: KIRA; 2017. 152 p.
  10. Gromtsev A.N. Secondary forests in the west of the Russian boreal zone: concepts, genesis, identification. Transactions of the Karelian research centre of the Russian academy of sciences. 2019;(5):5–16. DOI: 10.17076/eco900.
  11. Tretyakov S.V., Koptev S.V., Neverov N.A., Novikova N.S. Conservation and sustainable managementof the agricultural landscapes in the Kargopolsky sector of Kenozersky national park. Arctic Environmental Research. 2014;(3):40–47.
  12. Tomilov N.A. Ethnic ecology, environmental history and natural-environmental culture. Herald of Omsk University. Series: Historical studies. 2016;(2):88–93.
  13. Nakvasina E.N. Traditsionnoe zemlepol’zovanie kak forma otrazheniya sovremennogo lesnogo landshafta severa Russkoi ravniny [Traditional land use as a form of reflection of the modern forest landscape of the north of the Russian Plain]. In: Global’nye problemy Arktiki i Antarktiki : sbornik nauch. materialov Vseros. konf. s mezhdunar. uchastiem (Arkhangel’sk, 2-5 November 2020 g.). Gliko A.O., Baryakh A.A., Lobanov K.V., Bolotov I.N., eds. Arkhangel’sk: FITSKIA URO RAN; 2020. pp. 723–725.
  14. Kozykin A.V. A technique to evaluate agricultural landscape changes on the basis of GIS-processed 1861 demarcation plans and current description of Kenozero National Park. Historical Information Science. 2021;(2):221–236. DOI: 10.7256/2585-7797.2021.2.35089.
  15. Lyuri D.I., Goryachkin S.V., Karavaeva N.A., Denisenko E.A., Nefedova T.G. Dinamika sel’skokhozyaistvennykh zemel’ Rossii v KHKH veke i postagrogennoe vosstanovlenie rastitel’nosti i pochv [Dynamics of agricultural lands of Russia in the twentieth century and post-agrogenic restoration of vegetation and soils]. Moscow: GEOS; 2010. 426 p.

Key words: land use; ecological and historical transformation; historical GIS; boundary plans; satellite images; forest management plans; types of land

Section: Application of GIS technologies