Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content

Geoinformatika

Journal of geoinformation technologies in geology and geoecology

Geoinformatika

Main menu

  • About the Journal
  • № 2 (2025)
  • Partners
  • Subscription
  • Русский

Search Results for: "Section: Geoecology"

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Mapping of the environmental tension of the urbanized territory in consideration of regulatory and legal restrictions

№ 4 (2023) УДК 528.94: 502.2: 504.03 https://doi.org/10.47148/1609-364X-2023-4-61-73 Lopatkin D.A., Vorobyоv A.N. Key words: urbanized territory, ecological framework, cartographic modelling, functional use of land, anthropogenic impact Section: Geoecology

Ecological and agronomic geoinformation system of radioactively contaminated lands of Tula Research Institute

№ 4 (2023) УДК 528.952:631.95 https://doi.org/10.47148/1609-364X-2023-4-52-60 Krechetnikova E.O., Krechetnikov V.V., Kuznetsov V.K., Titov I.E. Key words: adaptive landscape farming, agroGIS, agricultural lands, radiation safety, agrolandscape, vector map, layer Section: Geoecology

Analytical situational center of the region in the context of energy-ecological, socio-economic and infrastructural indicators

№3 (2023) УДК 004.942; 004.62 https://doi.org/10.47148/1609-364X-2023-3-81-92 Shamaeva E.F., Perevozchikova A.K. Key words: information, geoinformation technologies, situation center, regional systems, statistical data, methods of processing, storage, presentation of data, temporal and spatial data analysis Section: Geoecology

Geoecological assessment of the prospective system for the development of cities in the Central Chernozemic region of Russia based on the index method

№3 (2023) УДК 911.375:528.88 https://doi.org/10.47148/1609-364X-2023-3-71-80 Dubrovskaya S.A. Key words: nature management, modern challenges, comfort of the urban environment, cartographic models, landscape unit, geomorphometric indicators, spatial differentiation, geoinformation index of comfort Section: Geoecology

Individual and pair representativeness of sampling points selection in interpolation tasks of the heavy metals distribution in the topsoil

№3 (2023) УДК 504.064.2.001.18 https://doi.org/10.47148/1609-364X-2023-3-63-70 Baglaeva E.M., Sergeev A.P., Shichkin A.V., Buevich A.G., Butorova A.S. Key words: representativeness of points, sampling, heavy metals, artificial neural networks, choice of training subset Section: Geoecology

Application of Wolfram Mathematica for Geoinformation Modeling of Forest Ecosystems

№2 (2023) https://doi.org/10.47148/1609-364X-2023-2-49-56 Vagizov M.R., Vitlev K.A., Sokolov A.G., Popov A.I., Samsonov V.A., Makarov K.A. Key words: forest, information technologies, artificial intelligence, algorithm Section: Geoecology

Geoinformation and remote methods for assessing snow cover pollution (Kyzyl)

№1 (2023) Chupikova S.А., Chuldum A.F. УДК 004.550 https://doi.org/10.47148/1609-364X-2022-1-63-70 Key words: remote sensing data, databases, GIS technologies, snow cover, indicators, correlation Section: Geoecology

Development of a database of three-dimensional models of deciduous forest species of Birch and Aspen for a geoinformation model of the forest ecosystem

№3 (2022) УДК 004.94 https://doi.org/10.47148/1609-364X-2022-3-39-46 Vagizov M.R., Shishkin M.L., Istomin E.P., Novikova M.A., Boytsov A.K. Key words: databases, geoinformation modeling, 3-d modeling, forest ecosystems, the birch is hanging, the poplar is trembling, the aspen. Section: Geoecology

Information basis for designing an adaptive landscape farming system on radioactively contaminated agricultural lands of Plavsky District, Tula Region

№2 (2022) Krechetnikov V.V., Krechetnikova E.O., Kuznetsov V.K., Titov I.E. УДК 631.95 https://doi.org/10.47148/1609-364X-2022-2-62-68 Key words: Nuclear pollution, agricultural land, adaptive landscape farming system, GIS, maps, attribute database, agricultural landscape Section: Geoecology

Technology of forming a mapping database on waste and secondary resources management facilities

№1 (2022) УДК 504.064.2.001.18 https://doi.org/10.47148/1609-364X-2022-1-47-57 Lyubimova A.V., Shamaeva E.F., Bykov M.A., Sokolov A.S. Key words: geographic information systems, cartographic database, secondary resources, production and consumption waste, regional development, closed-loop economy. Section: Geoecology

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

For authors

  • Rules for authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Publishing Ethics

Archives

2025
  • № 2 (2025)
  • №1 (2025)
2024
  • №4 (2024)
  • №3 (2024)
  • №2 (2024)
  • №1 (2024)
2023
  • №4 (2023)
  • №3 (2023)
  • №2 (2023)
  • №1 (2023)
2022
  • №4 (2022)
  • №3 (2022)
  • №2 (2022)
  • №1 (2022)
2021
  • №4 (2021)
  • №3 (2021)
  • №2 (2021)
  • №1 (2021)
2020
  • №4 (2020)
  • №3 (2020)
  • №2 (2020)
  • №1 (2020)
2019
  • №4 (2019)
  • №3 (2019)
  • №2 (2019)
  • №1 (2019)
2018
  • №4 (2018)
  • №3 (2018)
  • №2 (2018)
  • №1 (2018)
2017
  • №4 (2017)
  • №3 (2017)
  • №2 (2017)
  • №1 (2017)
2016
  • №4 (2016)
  • №3 (2016)
  • №2 (2016)
  • №1 (2016)
2015
  • №4 (2015)
  • №3 (2015)
  • №2 (2015)
  • №1 (2015)
2014
  • №4 (2014)
  • №3 (2014)
  • №2 (2014)
  • №1 (2014)

ISSN 1609-364X

Address: 117105, Moscow, Varshavskoye Shosse, 8, Geoinformatics Department of All-Russian Research Geological Oil Institute, Editorial board of the journal “Geoinformatika”
Tel.: (495) 952-21-57; fax: (495) 954-24-47
E-mail: artur@geosys.ru; a.sidorova@geosys.ru; i.khalyavkina@geosys.ru

Proudly powered by WordPress