№3 (2023) УДК 004.942; 004.62 https://doi.org/10.47148/1609-364X-2023-3-81-92 Shamaeva E.F., Perevozchikova A.K. Key words: information, geoinformation technologies, situation center, regional systems, statistical data, methods of processing, storage, presentation of data, temporal and spatial data analysis Section: Geoecology
№4 (2015) Kargashin P.E.,Novakovsky B.A.,Kiseleva S.V.,Prasolova A.I.,Verevkina N.S. Section: Application of GIS technologies Keywords: Geodatadases, unconventional sources, renewable energy, geoinformational routines, conceptual modelling, spatial data analysis.
№3 (2018) Arbuzova E.V.,Lyubimova A.V.,Tolmacheva E.R Section: Solving practical tasks Keywords: geoinformation technologies, spatial data analysis, geophysical survey coverage, seismic profiles, oil-and-gas boreholes.
№2 (2018) Nikiforov S.L.,Koshel S.M.,Libina N.V. Section: Modeling geo objects and geo-processes Keywords: digital elevation model, bottom, Arctic, shelf, White Sea, Barents Sea, marine geophysics, geology, geomorphology.
Modified algorithmic system FCAZm and strong earthquake-prone areas in California.Dzeboev B.A., Krasnoperov R.I., Belov I.O., Barykina Yu.V., Vavilin E.V. … » Recognition of strong (М ≥ 6½) earthquake-prone areas in California has been performed using the modified version (FCAZm) of the original … Continue reading →